<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Gestalt IT - Latest Comments in Enterprise Computing: Is the Solid State Drive Hype Over?</title><link>http://gestaltit.disqus.com/</link><description>The best independent IT commentary</description><atom:link href="https://gestaltit.disqus.com/is_the_solid_state_drive_hype_over/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:17:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Enterprise Computing: Is the Solid State Drive Hype Over?</title><link>http://gestaltit.com/syndicated/chris/enterprise-computing-is-the-solid-state-drive-hype-over/#comment-24928308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When there is such a disparity between consumer and enterprise stuff...well high end IT guys are sometimes oblivious but we're not dumb. I'm running several VMs that have high IO but no lasting data (mostly running compiles) off of a mirrored pair of Intel X-25's. If I can't move my data bases to them I'll just have to wait a bit - either SSD or RAM will work for holding my DB, I don't really care which.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremyinnc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:17:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>